Archive for platform

Interviewed on E-Marketing Insights podcast

// August 2nd, 2010 // 0 Comments // As featured in..., Content, Industry, My work, platform, Social Media

This week I was interviewed by Owen of the E-Marketing Insights Podcast. Listen in for a little background history of Doing Words, as well as my perspective on what happened in the early days internet content publishing, how the Web 1.0 bubble grew and burst, why social media has changed the content publishing industry irrevocably, the continuing democratisation of content, and which brands I believe are best-equipped to succeed in future content markets.

Surgeon-General’s Warning: I hadn’t taken my brevity medication before the interview so you may find I rattle on for quite some time.

You know what’s great about this podcast episode? It’s only episode four of a brand-new podcast. It was recorded on a portable digital recorder, in my car, and the total post-production probably took Owen only an hour, from importing, editing and through to hosting on Soundcloud.

Despite the market-dominating power of iTunes and News Corporation and Facebook, more unique new content is being published every year by the people who would have been considered “the audience” twenty years ago.

Check out Owen’s E-Marketing Insights podcast, it’s early days yet but shows great promise, and that’s the best kind of content there is.

How much is the cloud costing you?

// May 11th, 2010 // 0 Comments // platform, software

In the bright new world of Software As A Service (SAAS) our software sits on a server somewhere and is made available to us in a web browser or a client app, connected over the internet. Nobody doubts that this is the future of software, least of all me, since I’m a habitual early adopter and I would rather keep all the disk space on my MacBook Pro available for music, photos and video ;-)

That said, this bright new world comes at a cost. I’m now paying $60 a month for 60GB of data on a DSL2 connection and about $40 a month in iPhone data charges, of which a significant chunk is accessing cloud resources. But that’s just the beginning — I’m now paying about $2,000 a year in SAAS software subscriptions!

.

Product
Per month
Per annum Essentialness to me

.

Xero $49 $588 High

.

PlanHQ $9 $108 Low

.

Basecamp $24 $288 Medium

.

Highrise $29 $348 High

.

Ballpark $6 $72 Low

.

Flickr $25 High

.

Evernote $45 $540 Low

.

Total $1,969

.

Back in the bad old pre-SAAS days, I paid about $600 for a copy of Microsoft Office. Granted, it was buggy as hell, I couldn’t access my files from another machine, and it didn’t do any of the collaborative, CRM or media functions that some of my cloud apps will do. And I should also note that a big chunk of my business is made possible by Google Apps, which I get for free even though I am apparently the only person in the world who doesn’t click on sponsored listings in search results.

Still, thank goodness the cost of cloud storage and processing is coming down so fast, because the cost of subscribing to the software is more significant than I realised. I’m not complaining, mind, I’m just thinking twice about ordering that shiny new iPad+3G because I think I just spent the money on the cloud.

Am I crazy? I think the iPad is a ballsy, feature-packed game changer in a category of its own

// January 28th, 2010 // 0 Comments // platform, Products

I’ve been very busy this week with client work, the last week of the school holidays, and visiting my wife in hospital. Lousy timing, when all I really want to do is soak up all the reportage and commentary about Apple’s iPad. I just haven’t had time. I haven’t been able to swap observations with workmates and friends. I’m half out of the loop when I’m dying to be at the epicentre. Poor me.

Even so, I can tell that much of the reaction has been negative, with many writers and bloggers disappointed about a lack of innovative new technology, about lack of 3G at launch, about delays to international availability, even about the name.

Well hell, it all sounds very familiar to me: it sounds a lot like the pundit reaction to the launch of the first iPhone. Like the iPhone, the iPad is more a case of existing technologies re-imagined than bleeding-edge next-generation. Critics at the time lambasted the iPhone’s camera as too low-res, the storage as too small, the battery life as insufficient, and aside from the multi-touch interface, there was nothing cool and new for a hardware geek to fall for. (more…)

Apple’s tablet might change the way writers and photographers are paid

// December 3rd, 2009 // 0 Comments // Media, News, platform

Today I watched an amazing video demo from Time Inc., showing some of the things they can do with Sports Illustrated magazine when it’s available on devices like the rumoured Apple Tablet. The video in question is reproduced just below, for your future-reading pleasure. While watching the reader navigate their own way around the publication not just on a page-order basis but subhead and by image or video, it occurred to me: this could really change the way ‘real’ (read: print) journalists and photographers get paid for their work.

At the moment, most of the journalists in the world who still have paying work are paid by newspapers and magazines. And most of those journalists — whether on staff or freelance — are paid either by the number of words or pictures published, or paid a salary.

When you watch this video, take a moment to consider how much the reader is able to customise their reading material. It’s almost like no reader will read the magazine the same way. When you think about it, that’s probably true with most readers of print publications today; most of us start at the front and flip pages, but many of us start on a favourite section and hop around from section to section. (more…)

Let your users show you the money

// October 22nd, 2009 // 0 Comments // platform, Products, Startup, strategy

To paraphrase William Gibson, “The street always finds its own uses for things.” If you’re starting an online marketplace, or a social messaging platform, or an online community, one of the big challenges is to stay in touch with your users, to learn more about how they use your platform.

Why? Often ‘the street’ (your customers) will use your platform for surprising purposes. Likely, purposes you didn’t have in mind. Should you ignore their preference and try to force customers to bend to your will, or bend to theirsand try to find a commercially successful model for what they’re doing? (more…)

On the importance of owning your web platform

// December 9th, 2008 // 0 Comments // platform, Startup, strategy

 

Who cares how the platform works? This is the subtext to a lot of web startup business plans I see
“Who cares how the platform works”? This is the subtext to a lot of web startup business plans I see. At this point, you’ve lost me.

For web businesses, web platforms are not like phone connections and photocopy paper, they are tightly woven into the fabric of every aspect of your company

But first, big props to Balsamiq, the mockup tool I used to do the image above. It costs $79, comes in Mac, Windows, and Linux versions, or you can use it from within ConfluenceJIRA and XWiki wikis if you use one of those to manage your product process. It’s the best quick mockup tool I’ve ever used – quicker even than pencil and paper, and after about a month of use, it’s an essential part of my paper prototyping and developer briefing toolkit. Product people: if you have a customer or business process owner who’s always bugging you, give them this to use and tell them if they can sketch it, you’ll build it. It’s so easy to use even the dumbest marketing manager can figure it out. It’ll teach them more about web development than a week of workshops and you can get some real work done in the meantime. More about Balsamiq later.

If you’re starting a trucking company, you need at least one guy who knows about trucks. If you’re going to franchise a network of muffin bakeries, better get yourself someone who can make great muffins. Have a guess what kind of skills you need to have before you decide to open a scuba school… give yourself a gold star.

Late last week I met with a potential client (yay, I love potential clients, sometimes even more than actual clients.) The potential client shall remain nameless to protect their identity.

We met. They stepped me through an impressive and well thought-out introduction to the business, all the way through a detailed business plan, laboriously detailed spreadsheets listing costs to be incurred in the first three years, introduced the entire executive team and… uh oh…

…there was no Chief Technology Officer on the executive team. There was no budget line for recruiting a top-line team of web developers, product manager, interaction designer and customer service manager. They were planning to outsource the whole lot.

Common mistake, but critical mistake nonetheless.

Let me be absolutely clear on this: if you are a web business, you need to own your own web platform. You need to have the people responsible for the web platform represented at director level in your company, aligned with your business goals and sufficiently motivated to bring onboard a web platform team of the highest calibre.

If you’re starting a trucking company, you need at least one person who knows about trucks. If you’re going to franchise a network of muffin bakeries, better get yourself someone who can make great muffins. Have a guess what kind of skills you need to have before you decide to open a scuba school… give yourself a gold star.

In other words, web businesses are usually not businesses-that-happen-to-have-websites. When you outsource a web platform you not only incur additional cost and add to your relationship-management burden, you miss out on all the intellectual property of actually running the business.

For instance, if you discover a better way of helping customers choose and add something to a shopping cart, you can act on that learning lesson more quickly if you own the team that implements it, and crucially you keep the IP on not just the business process but the platform code used to build it, which lets you get better and faster at making other improvements in the future.

If you’re a web business, how well your web platform works defines the success or failure of almost every metric of your business: converting consumers to customers, average revenue per customer, customer churn, competitive moves, and most crucially of all, time-to-iterate. Name a big, successful web business that is still on an outsourced platform.

It’s OK to be the founding team and not have a senior technology guru there with you from day one, just as it’s OK to not have your CFO or even your CEO hired yet. But recognise that you will need that person, and you will need that person to hire a team, and that team, while it may use off the shelf and SAAS and hosted components to build your web platform, will ultimately deliver something unique that your competitors can never hope to imitate; something your suitors will pay an arm and a leg to get to… the experience that comes from building and  operating a successful web platform.

Let a thousand free web apps bloom!

// May 15th, 2008 // 0 Comments // platform, Startup

Let a thousand Joels bloom!

Tip of the hat to Jufemaiz for twittering Cycloloco.com’s cool web tool for making custom marker icons for Google Maps. Here’s a fun map using his icon in his honour.

This is exactly the kind of little friendly, free-or-nearly-free web tool that he and I are both rather excited about at the moment. Excited because (a) we think they’re The Future; and (b) because together we’re building one of our own.

More news as it comes to hand!

Will you help Trippything?

// May 2nd, 2008 // 0 Comments // platform, Products, Startup

As some of you may know, Elliot and I are toiling away building TrippyThing, a website that turns unfriendly, jargon-heavy confirmation emails from travel booking services into understandable, friendly, shareable trip itineraries.

200805020132.jpg

We hope to tell you more about our launch timeframe for TrippyThing soon.

Right now, we need your help to add to our collection of travel booking confirmation emails.

These are the emails you receive when you book a flight, room, car, etc. The more confirmation emails we receive, the more services TrippyThing will work with when we launch.

We need your help. We need you to send us as many booking emails as possible, from as many companies as possible. In return for your help, we promise to build a cracking-good web service that will save you heaps of time when you next book a trip. (more…)

Way too many timezone settings in my life

// January 23rd, 2008 // 0 Comments // Mobile, platform


Way too many timezone settings in my life
Originally uploaded by thatjonesboy.

Praise Jobs I have an iPhone now so I have one fewer gadget in my bag when travelling, but still, I’m sick of changing timezones on different devices and applications.

I live a moderately-wired life: my wife and I share iCal calendars, I refer to my schedule on my iPhone and Mac during the day, and I work at bluepulse.com where we use Google Calendar to manage office schedules.

Is it too much to ask OpenID and the online identity industry to include ‘current time zone’ in the data they store on my behalf? I foresee a future in which we need only tell one device or service that they’ve changed timezone, and all their devices and services are updated.

Meanwhile, I just need to forget to change timezones on one device or service and events start appearing at the wrong times in one or more places. If I don’t notice, and then sync the devices again, it’s way too easy to end up with two copies of each event, and then it takes a lot of searching and deleting – event-by-event – to bring things back to an even keel.

Imagine telling bluepulse or <twitter that you’re now on Pacific Time and knowing that your phone, calendar app and web service will be updated automagically. It’s not utopia, but it’s in the same timezone.

Choice is more often a feeling than an action

// October 29th, 2007 // 0 Comments // platform, Products

Duncan Riley is copping some criticism on Techcrunch over his opinion that OS X Leopard’s widgets are newsworthy enough to report on.

I think it’s an interesting feature of Leopard, but not really significant to the widget sector (is it a sector yet? ;-) covered by TC.

Unlike most other widget platforms, OS X’s widgets are hidden in a Widget app that you need to open first, reducing the number of views/user. They aren’t cross-platform, and Leopard’s market share is only a slice of the total OS X installed base. I don’t know what share of the total OS market OS X enjoys, but it must be small. Growing faster than other OSes, likely, but from a very low base.

Microsoft, with it stated aim of being the Internet OS – and its long-developed habit of copying Apple’s interfaces – may eventually copy this ‘create your own widget from the browser’ feature, but at MSFT’s current rate of innovation, count on seeing that some time >2020, by which time it’ll be Mozilla-based browsers, not IE, that will have dominant market share.

The other thing to consider is what percentage of users will make their own widget given the opportunity to do so. My experience working on personalisable homepages for portals suggests that while everyone ticks “yes” when you ask them whether they want their own personalisable homepage, when the product goes live, most of those yes-tickers will never take the time to personalise their homepage. My observations suggest that ease-of-use has no bearing on that result – it doesn’t matter if it’s one button on the toolbar away.

Personalisation is like fast-food – knowing that the fast-food franchise lets you choose your own fillings gets you in the door rather than the competitor’s door. But 98% of us choose the off-the-shelf burger after we walk in and view the menu because it’s quicker, easier, and we figure whoever decided that pickles and ketchup go together must know what they’re doing. Mistakenly…

We think we want choice, but what we really want is the feeling that we could choose if we wanted to.