Posts Tagged ‘product strategy’

In product strategy, faith is a handicap

// October 16th, 2009 // 0 Comments // Startup, strategy

(This story originally ran on the Pollenizer blog and is re-published here because it’s on my mind right now and it still has legs… the story, not my mind.)

You remember the future we were promised, right? It had flying cars, robotic housemaids, one-piece shiny suits and meals in convenient pill form. We don’t live in that future because the people planning utopia fell in love with their own beliefs about what consumers wanted. They missed the gross and subtle cues that consumers use to indicate that this is not something they want, need or are prepared to pay for. It’s important to learn how to read those cues or your own startup vision may turn out to be as popular as nuclear flying car.

But first, let’s look back on the brighter, shinier future we were promised. As an impressionable adult I look back on when I was an impressionable boy and remember how deeply I had bought-in to that utopian future. At the age of 12 I had decided I’d be working as a journalist in a bustling colony on the Moon by the age of 30, flying to work, my only wardrobe choices the silver one-piece or the bronze one-piece, working late each night on a dinner pill. I’m a geek and I bought it wholesale. This was the future I wanted. Turns out, I was in the minority!

In the future, utopia will be something you can climb on. Also, pigeons may poop on it. (Photo: a href=

What happened to our bright utopian future? Real consumer behaviour happened. Society did not and does not really want a utopian future. Consider this: each of those emblemic utopian products kinda/sorta exists today:

Flying car: the Terrafugia Transition is more of a driveable airplane than a flyable car but it’s roadworthy, and once it has approval from the authorities you can drive it to an airport and fly it to another airport. The future we were promised included nuclear fusion-powered saucers, so where did the utopian product manager go wrong? He Underestimating the bureaucracy of the FAA, sure, but really the big mistake was an unfounded optimism that if consumer demand was high enough, the nascent nuclear industry would be able to solve the safety and disposal problems of nuclear energy. Turns out, no amount of commute time saved is enough to offset the fear of contaminating your neighbourhood with radioactive waste for the next half a million years. Almost always emotions (fear) beat logic (we’ll solve this) in the consumer mind.

Meals in pill form: turns out in reality meals are more easily delivered in powder form, and you can even get something better than a meal, if what you want to do is lose weight. Turns out the powdered meal replacement marketplace is quite a bit bigger than the market for flying cars but it’s not something most people choose to do. What went wrong? If asked, “Would you like to be able to save time by consuming a meal in pill form?” most consumers will say yes: sometimes they would like that. But the unasked question is, “how often?” and our utopian product manager either didn’t ask that or didn’t want to hear the answer.

Shiny one-piece suits: you only have to go to a fashion show, a car race, or buy one online to debunk the idea that these are somehow more practical and comfortable than jeans and a tee. Our utopian product manager was on happy drugs for this one.

Robot housemaid: the robot housemaid could be easily the most mainstream utopian product that exists today, yet consumers just won’t go for it. The iRobot company of Massacheusetts makes a whole range of the things. I pitch the joys of Roomba ownership to almost every visitor to our house — I’m famous for it — and I’m not too shabby at the art of the pitch. Anybody who doesn’t believe me need only check Amazon – this is a product that gets a 5 star review from nearly half the people who’ve bought one. So why have I been unable to convert even one single person yet?

Two simple reasons: almost everybody who cares about a clean floor already has a vacuum cleaner; and without exception they actually prefer to clean their floor themselves to make sure the job is done to their own high standard. They don’t want to be freed of the burden of cleaning the floor. They might tell a utopian product manager that they would love to be able to trust the cleaning to a robot, but you know what? They never will. Their housekeeping ability is closely associated with their self-esteem. You would have to pay them to allow a robot to do it, and even then they would stand there and watch it work, waiting for it to fail. That’s not increasing quality of life, it’s increasing anxiety. The only product people are prepared to buy that increases their anxiety is tobacco, apparently.

Even good startup founders make bad decisions

As startup founders designing online services, what can we learn from the mistakes of the utopian product manager? It is this: the very faith that makes you a good startup founder makes you a lousy judge of what consumers truly want to buy from you.

To even get a break as a startup founder you need an idea; more than idea, you need a dream, preferrably an unshakeable one. You need to evangelise not just consumers but sceptical investors, employees, industry and media. You can walk in with a meter-high stack of convincing-looking qualitative and quantitative research meant to back you up, but at best that’ll help with the post-purchase rationalisation. People will get on-board because they believe you, and they will believe you only if you have faith. And faith does not require facts. In fact, the more you have faith, the less you need facts and the more likely you are to select the facts that reinforce your faith.

The successful startup founders I know often have the uncanny ability to go to bat — and hit a home run — for ideas they don’t have much faith in. It’s a psychological makeup that is useful in sales roles; perhaps that’s why I know many successful startup founders from a sales background. Faith can really get in the way of building products consumers want. Not having faith in your product and your strategy requires you to apply reason, it allows you to subject a business to the strictest scrutiny, to make 110% sure that consumers aren’t just being polite to the nice young man who asked them if they’d be interested in buying a nuclear-powered flying car.

If you have faith, perhaps you have the wrong product, or you are the wrong person for the job. Get yourself a CEO (stay on as founder) an equal partner or an advisory board who don’t need faith and then pay close attention to what they’re telling you about what the market is saying.

Sadly for those of us who’d still love to be flying our robot housemaids, if you don’t have faith but everybody believes you anyway, you’re well on your way to success.

(That’s a depressing note to end on, so here’s a very funny skit about flying cars and what you should — or shouldn’t — be prepared to do to get one.)

Juley* I’m back!

// August 27th, 2008 // 0 Comments // Me

#mobilefeast Showtime! Time to see if I can walk the walk...

*”Juley” means “hello” in Tibetan.

I was on a speaker panel at Mobile Feast today so I suppose I can’t pretend to be in the Himalayas any longer! Yes, I’m back, though it took me a week to complete triage on 1900+ unread emails and deal with a pile of bills and other snail mail.

I’m still in the process of uploading some 8Gb of photos I took while in the Himalayas, but there are already some good shots there if you have a moment to check them out. I’ve sprinkled a few at the end of this post if you don’t have time to go to Flickr.

This was the first Mobile Feast conference, and while any new conference can use a tweak, it was a promising start for a conference that aims to help businesspeople from outside the mobile industry understand what the future of the mobile internet might look like. I was speaking on a panel predicting what future mobile content might look like, and with me on the panel where Stephen Kilsby of game developer Viva La Mobile, Jennifer Zanich from mobile social networking startup Xumii, and Christina Thurn from Walt Disney’s internet arm.

While I didn’t have to present with any slides (yay) I had a few things to say along these lines:

  • Youth finds its own uses for things. Young film makers took cinema – originally a fine art medium – and invented Hollywood blockbusters. Young music producers took the music production industry built for recording jazz music and used it to make something 100x bigger – rock and roll. TV and computers were both built by an older generation, then ‘hacked’ by a younger generation who did things that were new, different and world-changing. The next big generations (Y and Z) will be consuming content and services primarily via a mobile, not a desktop or laptop. They won’t grow into a desktop as they age. They will make content and services on mobile devices that are as incomprehensible to us as Jimi Hendrix was was to the men who invented the LP, but which will find millions of customers and make millions of dollars for those of us smart enough to back the right young innovators. We should stop trying to define how this generation ‘should’ use the mobile web and focus instead on observing how they use it – that’s how we’ll discover how to make the mobile blockbusters of the future.
  • The iPhone Appstore is the beginning of the end of the mobile ‘carrier deck’. The appstore is the mobile equivalent of the ‘My Yahoo!’ and ‘My Excite’ personalisable homepages of the late ’90s desktop internet – a necessary middle stage between the walled garden of AOL and Compuserve and the open, unrestricted access of Google. On mobile devices, the carrier deck will be replaced by a user-generated deck – a mobile homepage created by the mobile user and their sphere of friends – the content, topics and products they love/hate right now. Find the right taste-makers and mavens in the mobile youth market now if you want to get big usage of your mobile content or applications – these people are nearly free at the moment but will become more expensive as they realise the commercial power they have.
  • The demise of the carrier deck will also allow content and application publishers to derive some ‘long tail’ revenue. Carrier decks kill long tail revenue by burying old content/apps too deep. To illustrate the potential of long tail revenue for mobile content I pulled out my iPhone and played ‘Duck Dodgers in the 24½th Century’ – a Daffy Duck cartoon made by Warner Bros. in 1952 – I’d just rented it on iTunes Store for my son to watch on my iPhone and Apple TV. 1952 and still renting? Talk about a long tail!
  • Carriers will soon be forced to share data revenues with content/app publishers like they do with handset manufacturers. Too much of the revenue in the mobile industry still rests with the ‘dumb pipe’ providers. Too much consumption of that data will be driven by the publishers. Critical mass will be reached sometime in the next five years, probably with a deal between social network or social messaging providers.
  • Apple’s total market cap recently overtook Google’s. I’ve been a user of Apple’s ‘soup to nuts’ delivery channel from content publisher tools to online content sales systems to home entertainment hardware for long enough to make this prediction with confidence: Apple will be the largest entertainment company in the world, measured by revenue, in the next five years. Feel free to remind me I said that!

Finally, what I didn’t get to say was that eight years ago this month I was busy delivering the first mobile content for an Olympic games – the Sydney Olympics 2000. So much amazing progress has happened in less than a decade!

See, in 2000 Yahoo! was angling to try and be the major online partner of the games. Though no mobile content rights were made available by the IOC, Mark Jackson and the good folks from the Sydney Olympic Organising Committee did their best to help us out. Problem: there were almost no web-enabled handsets in Australia at the time.

So we recruited and trained spokesmodels to ride visitors around Sydney in Yahoo!-branded rickshaws and offer to show them our WAP coverage and SMS alerts, driven by content licensed from local content publishers.

The content was served in an early WAP browser, was text only, woefully behind the live results available on TV, and was delivered incredibly slowly on Nokia 7110 handsets. If you were really in no hurry to get somewhere, our spokesmodels would help you login to your Yahoo! account on the handset (it took about 4-5mins per login) and set up some SMS alerts (which most users would soon turn off because not only were they out of date, SMS was punishingly expensive.) The spokesmodel could also take your photo at the Olympics in Sydney and upload it to Yahoo! Photos so you could share it with your friends… only, not until the spokesmodel returned to a desktop PC later in the day, since the handset didn’t have a camera and even a 100k image would have taken centuries to upload even if there was a way to get the image file onto the handset. My first cameraphone was a SonyEricsson T68i that had the camera as a separate plug-in device, released the following year.

From memory, I think we had 10 spokesmodels on rickshaws at any one time, each with a Nokia 7110 and we just about emptied Nokia’s stocks of 7110s – we had most of the 7110s in the country at that time. Let’s be generous and say maybe there were a hundred 7110 handsets in Australia at that time and assume all of them had been setup for WAP access (the 7110 didn’t usually come with WAP settings pre-installed) . So in August 2000, less than a decade ago, there were maybe a hundred mobile handsets in Australia capable of mobile browsing. Desperately slow browsing, in greyscale only, at very great expense and with almost no Australian-generated content or applications to browse.

Yes, we have a long way to go, but we have already come so far.


The next step in online banking: helping the customer?

// March 19th, 2008 // 0 Comments // Glocalisation, strategy

That’s a controversial headline, because the bankers I speak to say, "isn’t providing an online banking service helping the customer?" Well, not so much. Now every bank offers online banking, and most charge a fee of some kind, it’s less about helping the customer manage their money and more about helping the bank cut costs and increase revenue.

Yet banks of all shapes and sizes are striving to "engage more fully" with the retail customer, build a longer relationship, "broaden the relationship" . In other words, sell us more financial products and keep us as a customer for longer by knowing more about our financial needs.

So help me optimise every saving, cheque, term deposit, loan, credit card, lease, equity trading and piggy bank account I have. Help me learn where my money is going each month, help me balance my household budget.

The typical online customer relationship with an Australian bank is now almost entirely a task-oriented one: I need to pay a bill or transfer some money, so I click on a bookmark, login, do my transaction, and log-off again asap. Yet, other than perhaps the ATM machine, the online banking application is probably my primary touch-point with the bank’s brand and brand experience. For most of us, the ATM and the online banking application is my bank.

If I’m a bank, do I want an entirely task-oriented relationship with my customers? Definitely not.

Task-oriented relationships turn rich, diverse brands into utilities – the only time I care at all about my choice of gas provider is if I learn that I can get gas a lot cheaper from another utility brand. I do NOT want my bank to become just another utility. So, how can banks use that utilitarian touch point of the online banking application as leverage into a broader, richer, engaging relationship with their customers?

How about: help them manage their finances?

(more…)